The journey towards NFV has been underway for some time, with a pivotal milestone being the establishment of the NFV Industry Specification Group (ISG) by the European Telecommunications Standards Institute (ETSI). ETSI ISG NFV played a vital role in defining open-source standards for NFV and creating open-source implementations of NFV.

NFV Component Architecture

The foundation of NFV relies on three key components:

1. NFV Infrastructure (NFVI): NFVI encompasses all the software and hardware elements constituting the environment where NFVs operate. When NFVI spans multiple sites, the connecting network is considered an integral part of the NFVI.

2. Virtualized Network Functions (VNF): VNFs are network functions that can be implemented as software and deployed within the NFVI environment. Examples of VNFs include firewalls, software-defined WAN (SD-WAN) solutions, routing capabilities, and Quality of Service (QoS) management.

3. Management, Automation, and Network Orchestration (MANO): NFV MANO orchestrates and manages VNFs within the NFVI. It encompasses functional blocks, data repositories, reference points, and interfaces that facilitate communication while orchestrating and managing both NFVI and VNFs.

Network Functions Virtualization Use Cases

NFV finds application in various use cases, some of which include:

1. Service Chaining: Communication Service Providers (CSPs) can chain and interlink services or applications such as firewalls and SD-WAN network optimization, offering them as on-demand services.

2. Software-Defined Branch and SD-WAN: SD-WAN network optimization and SD-Branch security functionalities can be virtualized as NFVs, enabling their provisioning as fully virtualized services.

3. Network Monitoring and Security: NFV allows the implementation of firewalls, offering fully virtualized network flow monitoring and the application of security policies for traffic routed through the firewall.

NFV vs. SDN

NFV and Software-Defined Networking (SDN) are often viewed as complementary options for shaping the future of networks.

SDN abstracts network infrastructure into application, control plane, and data plane layers, making network control directly programmable. This facilitates automated provisioning and policy-based resource management. For instance, network changes can be made in software, eliminating the need for manual cable rearrangements.

NFV can be considered a use case of SDN, and vice versa. However, it’s entirely feasible to implement VNFs independently of SDN, and conversely.

Benefits of Network Functions Virtualization (NFV)

NFV offers several advantages, including:

1. Cost Reduction: Traditional physical appliances require purchasing, configuration, and consume space, power, and cooling. NFVs run on standard servers, often with significantly lower overhead requirements.

2. Rapid Deployment: NFVs are software-based, enabling swift deployment and easy updates. Compared to physical systems, initial deployment and updates are more time and resource-efficient.

3. Automation Support: As software entities, NFVs can be configured and managed programmatically. This allows organizations to leverage automation for rapid configuration changes or large-scale updates.

4. Enhanced Flexibility: NFVs, being software-based, can dynamically scale up or down by allocating more or fewer resources as needed. This flexibility is not feasible with physical appliances, which require the acquisition of additional units in fixed-size increments.

5. Reduced Vendor Lock-In: Physical security appliances often lead to vendor lock-in due to the complexity and expense of switching platforms. NFVs, capable of running on diverse hardware, empower organizations to choose hardware that aligns best with their specific needs.

Below is a relevant link for a technical article on Network Functions Virtualization (NFV):

ETSI NFV ISG – Official page of the European Telecommunications Standards Institute (ETSI) NFV Industry Specification Group, providing detailed information on NFV standards.